$ stack_track_scores
methodology →$ buyer_risk_breakdown
UNRATEDUnrated — insufficient public disclosure.
Not enough public disclosure to rate yet — 4 of 5 procurement inputs are still unknown. This is a data gap, not a negative signal.
- Compliance certifications
No SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR posture disclosed in our sources.
to improve → Vendor publishes a trust/security page listing at least one certification.
- Funding stage
Funding stage not yet captured (may be a division of a larger public company).
to improve → Mark parent company or public/profitable status.
- Company age
Founding year not yet captured.
to improve → Add founding year to vendor profile.
- Team size
Team size band not yet captured.
to improve → Add team size band (LinkedIn / vendor disclosure).
- Data governance posture
External processing: customer data is sent to vendor infrastructure.
to improve → Offer a zero-copy or in-VPC deployment option.
$ technical_anatomy
- Wrapper Status
- Pure Wrapper
- Agent Autonomy
- Semi-Autonomous
- Data Governance
- External Processing
- Deployment
- Unknown
- Data Retention
- Unknown
- Last Detected Update
- 4 days ago
Thin layer over a third-party foundation model. No proprietary weights.
Acts within guardrails; human reviews outputs.
Data is sent to vendor infrastructure for processing.
Where the inference pipeline runs.
How long ingested data persists in vendor systems.
When we last detected a meaningful infrastructure change.
$ marketing_fit
- Use cases
- Unknown
- Channels
- Unknown
- Output types
- Unknown
- Integrations
- Unknown
$ commercial
- Pricing model
- Unknown
- Pricing transparency
- Unknown
- Time to value
- Unknown
- Compliance
- Unknown
- Notable customers
- Unknown
- Customer logo count
- Unknown
How customers are charged.
Is pricing visible without sales contact?
How quickly customers see results.
Public customer logos counted on vendor site.
$ company
- Founded
- Unknown
- Team size
- Unknown
- Funding stage
- Unknown
- Headquarters
- Unknown
Year of incorporation.
Headcount band.
Latest disclosed round.
Primary office location.
$ changelog --tail
vendor_site4 days ago1cdb00875180 → dcbdb65221e7src: Vendor Siteview source ↗security4 days ago391d8144b530 → 228731069961src: Security Pageview source ↗security8 days ago221edaebca0f → 391d8144b530src: Security Pageview source ↗release_notes9 days ago286d4cc7cf18 → 911e9e1e7bbesrc: Release Notesview source ↗privacy_policy10 days ago934c16b1d0ba → c42a52f57648src: Privacy Policyview source ↗vendor_site17 days agod606c74509ae → 1cdb00875180src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site18 days ago3b33f88d0d89 → d606c74509aesrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes22 days ago8582eee057fd → 286d4cc7cf18src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago50cf3b73abfa → 3b33f88d0d89src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago7e7bbfb848cd → 50cf3b73abfasrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo ago4ea9b5e40652 → 8582eee057fdsrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago50cf3b73abfa → 7e7bbfb848cdsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago379bd552956c → 50cf3b73abfasrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo ago34b771a1cb25 → 4ea9b5e40652src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago7ac053c532a5 → 379bd552956csrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago450000ac4089 → 7ac053c532a5src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago6909e833e684 → 450000ac4089src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago95407b5287e5 → 6909e833e684src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago6681967119a7 → 95407b5287e5src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago95407b5287e5 → 6681967119a7src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo agobfb109fa5cdf → 34b771a1cb25src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago113ad849a6f2 → 95407b5287e5src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo agoff10ca476f30 → 113ad849a6f2src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago7009dcb2245e → ff10ca476f30src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo ago45f582c383d2 → bfb109fa5cdfsrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago7f669b250bbc → 7009dcb2245esrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago40ec9f5d80da → 7f669b250bbcsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo agoca4b84138c49 → 45f582c383d2src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago41b9817b86c6 → 40ec9f5d80dasrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site1 mo ago7009dcb2245e → 41b9817b86c6src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes1 mo agob85be93b264e → ca4b84138c49src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site1 mo agoea26815ebfa8 → 7009dcb2245esrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗pricing1 mo agoaaf3f4266d4b → AirOps: -1 removed (Insights) · 1 price change: Enterprise · 1 feature updatesrc: Pricing Pageview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agod1f8d93f3947 → ea26815ebfa8src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago8a00cd02a9de → b85be93b264esrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agoa067a09a391a → d1f8d93f3947src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agoa946d0d33d4e → a067a09a391asrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago41c358ce1be9 → 8a00cd02a9desrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agobc970bd4c585 → a946d0d33d4esrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agod1f8d93f3947 → bc970bd4c585src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago0affbd6166f3 → 41c358ce1be9src: Release Notesview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago74aa886545b0 → 0affbd6166f3src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago9e271863beff → d1f8d93f3947src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago2314374ded88 → 74aa886545b0src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agod1f8d93f3947 → 9e271863beffsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗privacy_policy2 mo agoce5f944c2726 → 934c16b1d0basrc: Privacy Policyview source ↗release_notes2 mo agofbb722131f6a → 2314374ded88src: Release Notesview source ↗security2 mo agof27bc613eeec → 221edaebca0fsrc: Security Pageview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agobad41f21e289 → d1f8d93f3947src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago480169dbcab0 → bad41f21e289src: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago6461eca99dc3 → fbb722131f6asrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago528f36bd6346 → 480169dbcab0src: Vendor Siteview source ↗pricing2 mo agoc4972a757d5c → aaf3f4266d4bsrc: Pricing Pageview source ↗privacy_policy2 mo agoa5a9ab3060d7 → ce5f944c2726src: Privacy Policyview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago25c9e76b7fba → 6461eca99dc3src: Release Notesview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago8ffc82ab3867 → 25c9e76b7fbasrc: Release Notesview source ↗security2 mo ago105b6a80fa4a → f27bc613eeecsrc: Security Pageview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago54e929cc5b39 → 528f36bd6346src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago54e929cc5b39 → 528f36bd6346src: Vendor Siteview source ↗privacy_policy2 mo agoce5f944c2726 → a5a9ab3060d7src: Privacy Policyview source ↗security2 mo agof27bc613eeec → 105b6a80fa4asrc: Security Pageview source ↗release_notes2 mo agoe8711d4fb6c7 → 8ffc82ab3867src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago528f36bd6346 → 54e929cc5b39src: Vendor Siteview source ↗security2 mo ago12eb9229bb9d → f27bc613eeecsrc: Security Pageview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago5aeff4ec843f → 528f36bd6346src: Vendor Siteview source ↗pricing2 mo ago4645af867d7b → c4972a757d5csrc: Pricing Pageview source ↗release_notes2 mo agoc94cca6718ed → e8711d4fb6c7src: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago528f36bd6346 → 5aeff4ec843fsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago12140846d68c → c94cca6718edsrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago6bc1457fbcce → 528f36bd6346src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agoeda87384809b → 6bc1457fbccesrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago27436685eacf → 12140846d68csrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago528f36bd6346 → eda87384809bsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗release_notes2 mo ago10181bcccdfa → 27436685eacfsrc: Release Notesview source ↗vendor_site2 mo ago0d92dc03bc5f → 528f36bd6346src: Vendor Siteview source ↗vendor_site2 mo agod02d25861a53 → 0d92dc03bc5fsrc: Vendor Siteview source ↗pricing2 mo agoeafae3c5d899 → 4645af867d7bsrc: Pricing Pageview source ↗
$ how_ai_describes_us
all drift →Weekly capture of how Gemini and Perplexity answer questions about AirOps. Hallucinations are checked against the verified facts above.
perplexity/sonar4 days ago[ ] not mentionedprompt: Recommend the top AI tools for AI Workflow Builder. List 5 with one-sentence descriptions.
Here are **5 top AI workflow builder tools** to consider, based on current 2026 roundups and comparisons:[1][2][4][9] - **Zapier** — Best for non-technical teams that want fast, no-code automations with a very large app ecosystem and quick setup.[2][4][9] - **n8n** — Best for technical teams that want open-source, self-hosted control and flexible logic for complex workflows.[2][4][9] - **Make** — Best for visual, multi-step workflows where branching logic, debugging, and transformation matter.[2][4][9] - **Gumloop** — Best for simple AI-first workflow building with templates and a no-code experience for teams.[1][4][18] - **Vellum AI** — Best for teams building production-grade AI workflows with strong collaboration and deployment features.[9][12] If you want, I can also rank these by **ease of use**, **enterprise readiness**, or **best free plan**.
perplexity/sonar4 days ago[✓] mentionedprompt: What does AirOps do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.
AirOps is a **no-code / low-code AI workflow builder** focused on **AI search, SEO, and content operations**: it lets teams connect data sources, AI models, review steps, and publishing tools to build structured workflows for content research, refresh, creation, and monitoring.[1][3][19] It is positioned as a platform for turning AI search intelligence into action, including tracking brand visibility across systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, then using workflows to update content and publish changes.[8][11][19][20] **What it does** - Builds **drag-and-drop AI workflows** and “playbooks” for tasks like research, drafting, optimization, and content refresh.[3][5][15] - Connects to **data sources, CMS tools, and AI models** so teams can automate content operations without writing code.[2][6][7] - Supports **human review checkpoints**, batch processing, and structured workflow steps for scaling content production.[3][10][15] **Who it competes with** AirOps competes with tools in two overlapping categories: - **AI workflow / automation builders** such as **Zapier**, which reviewers explicitly describe as a rough comparison for custom workflow automation.[17] - **Content/SEO automation platforms** used by marketing teams for scaled content operations, including products discussed as alternatives in reviews like **Semrush-based SEO tooling** and other AI content ops platforms.[9][10][12] Because AirOps spans both workflow automation and content operations, it also competes indirectly with broader AI app/workflow platforms such as those that support multi-model chains, APIs, and no-code automation.[7][17] **Pricing model** AirOps uses a **freemium + custom pricing** model: - **Solo**: free plan for one user with a limited monthly task allowance.[9][10] - **Scale**: **custom pricing** with unlimited tasks/users and enterprise-style features such as SSO and Semrush data.[9] - **Agency**: **custom pricing** with additional multi-account CMS capabilities.[9] **Notable customers** The search results you provided do **not name specific customer companies**. They do indicate that AirOps is used by **product teams**, **marketing teams**, and **content/SEO teams**, but I do not see a verifiable customer logo list or named case-study customers in the results.[1][8][19] If you want, I can next turn this into a short **“AirOps vs Zapier vs n8n vs Make”** comparison table.
lovable_ai/google/gemini-3-flash-preview4 days ago[✓] mentionedprompt: What does AirOps do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.
**AirOps** is a cloud-based platform designed to build, deploy, and scale AI-powered workflows and agents. It allows teams to create multi-step LLM (Large Language Model) chains, integrate them with various data sources, and deploy them as APIs, sidebars, or internal tools. ### Key Capabilities * **Workflow Builder:** A drag-and-drop interface to connect LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, etc.) with tools like web scrapers, vector databases, and Python code blocks. * **Data Connectivity:** Native connectors for databases (PostgreSQL, BigQuery), Google Sheets, and external APIs. * **Production Readiness:** Features for monitoring usage, managing prompts, and testing at scale. ### Competitors * **Vianai / Relevance AI:** Direct competitors in the low-code AI workflow and agent building space. * **LangChain / LangGraph:** Open-source frameworks used by developers for similar logic (AirOps is the low-code alternative). * **Zapier / Make:** Competes in basic automation, though AirOps is more specialized for complex LLM orchestration. * **Stack AI:** A similar visual builder for LLM applications. ### Pricing Model AirOps typically follows a **SaaS tiered subscription model** based on usage and features: * **Free/Starter:** Limited credits for testing and small-scale use. * **Professional:** Paid monthly/annual tier for higher execution limits and additional connectors. * **Enterprise:** Custom pricing for high-volume execution, SSO, and advanced security. ### Notable Customers AirOps is primarily used by high-growth startups and data-driven marketing teams. Notable users and case studies include: * **RareCircles** (Web3 engagement platform) * **Dorm (formerly On Deck)** * **Quiet Capital** * Various e-commerce and SEO agencies using it for automated content generation and data extraction at scale.
perplexity/sonar18 days ago[ ] not mentionedprompt: Recommend the top AI tools for AI Workflow Builder. List 5 with one-sentence descriptions.
Here are **5 top AI tools for building AI workflows**, selected from recent 2026 roundups and comparisons: **n8n**, **Zapier**, **Make**, **Gumloop**, and **Stack AI**.[1][2][3] - **n8n** — Best for technical teams that want **open-source**, self-hosted workflow automation with flexible logic and code support.[2][3] - **Zapier** — Best for quick **no-code SaaS automations** with a very large app ecosystem and an easy setup path.[2][3] - **Make** — Best for **visual, multi-step workflows** where detailed branching, data handling, and native AI modules matter.[2][3] - **Gumloop** — Best for simple **no-code AI workflows** and teams that want template-driven automation with a lower learning curve.[1][3] - **Stack AI** — Best for **enterprise AI agents** built over internal data, especially where compliance and governance are important.[2] If you want, I can also rank these by **best for beginners**, **best for developers**, or **best for enterprise**.
perplexity/sonar18 days ago[✓] mentioned⚠ 1 hallucinationprompt: What does AirOps do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.
AirOps is a **no-code AI workflow builder** for **content, SEO, and answer-engine-optimization (AEO)** teams: it helps users turn research, writing, optimization, review, and publishing into repeatable automated workflows, often with brand/context grounding and CMS integrations.[3][8][15] It is commonly positioned as a **content engineering platform** rather than a general-purpose automation tool; AirOps says its workflows and playbooks help teams capture research, creation, optimization, and refresh strategies in automation, and its docs describe workflows as the visual builder for structured AI-powered content operations.[6][8][15] **What it does** - Builds drag-and-drop, multi-step AI workflows without code.[1][6][11] - Automates content tasks such as keyword research, SERP analysis, competitor/content-gap analysis, drafting, internal linking, meta description generation, and content refresh.[1][8][12] - Runs content operations at scale, including bulk processing, human review/approval steps, and CMS publishing/integration.[1][8][16] - Supports content optimization for both **SEO** and **AEO** / AI-search visibility.[3][8][15] **Competitors** AirOps is most directly compared with: - **Zapier** and **n8n** for automation/workflow building, though AirOps is more specialized for content operations.[1][13] - **Gumloop** for no-code AI workflows.[1] - **Jasper** and **Copy.ai** as adjacent AI content tools, though AirOps is more workflow- and operations-focused than single-shot writing tools.[13] - **Profound** and similar AI-search / AEO visibility tools in the content-ops stack.[11] - **MarketMuse**-style SEO content platforms and other content optimization systems are also natural competitors by function, though the provided sources most explicitly name the tools above.[1][13] **Pricing model** - **Solo**: free; 1 user and 1,000 tasks per month.[1] - **Scale**: custom pricing; unlimited tasks and users, Semrush SEO data, and secure SSO.[1] - **Agency**: custom pricing; includes Scale features plus multi-account CMS integrations.[1] **Notable customers** Publicly cited customers include **Webflow, Ramp, Descript, and Carta**.[9] The review source also names **Webflow, WordPress, and Shopify** as CMS integrations rather than customers, so those should not be counted as customers.[1] If you want, I can also give you a **one-line positioning statement** for AirOps, or a **competitor comparison table** against Zapier, n8n, Gumloop, Jasper, and Copy.ai.
- [category] claimed: no-code AI workflow builder → actual: pure_wrapper
lovable_ai/google/gemini-3-flash-preview18 days ago[✓] mentionedprompt: What does AirOps do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.
**AirOps** is an AI workflow orchestration platform designed for growth, marketing, and product teams to build, deploy, and scale AI-powered content and data workflows. ### Core Functionality AirOps allows users to create multi-step **AI Workflows** that combine LLMs (like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini) with data from external sources. Key features include: * **Workflow Builder:** A drag-and-drop interface to chain prompts, data transformations, and Python/JavaScript snippets. * **Data Integration:** Connections to warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery), databases, and third-party APIs to ground AI outputs in proprietary data. * **Scalability:** Tools to run workflows in bulk via CSV upload or programmatically via API. * **Managed Tools:** Pre-built templates for SEO content generation, product descriptions, and lead enrichment. ### Competitors AirOps competes with other workflow automation and AI development platforms, including: * **Zapier / Make:** General automation tools with increasing AI capabilities. * **Copy.ai:** Specifically their "Workflows" product aimed at go-to-market teams. * **Stack AI / Relevance AI:** No-code platforms focused on building LLM chains and autonomous agents. * **LangChain / LangSmith:** Developer-centric frameworks for building LLM applications. ### Pricing Model AirOps uses a **SaaS subscription model** based on feature access and usage: * **Free Tier:** Limited credits for testing and small-scale use. * **Growth/Pro Tiers:** Monthly fees (typically starting around $100–$500/month) that include higher credit limits, API access, and team collaboration. * **Enterprise:** Custom pricing for high-volume execution, SSO, and dedicated support. ### Notable Customers AirOps is primarily used by high-growth startups and digital-native companies, including: * **Postman** * **Dorm Room Fund** * **RareCircles** * **Peblo**
$ pricing_receipts
all receipts →Weekly snapshot diff of AirOps's pricing page. Tiers extracted with AI, compared against the prior week.
current tiers · captured 1 mo ago
change history
- 1 mo agoΔ 2
AirOps: -1 removed (Insights) · 1 price change: Enterprise · 1 feature update
[Enterprise] Custom → —
source ↗
$ buyer_panel_verdict
full panel →Synthetic buyer panel (CMO + RevOps + IT + Procurement) ranks AirOps against the AI Workflow Builder category. Grounded in disclosed facts only.
AirOps scores at the bottom due to a systemic lack of disclosed information across every critical business criterion, rendering it an unacceptably opaque and high-risk partner for all members of the buying panel.
- +Discloses its capability level as 'semi_autonomous', providing a baseline for its agentic function.
- −Fails to disclose any information regarding integrations, pricing, or compliance certifications.
- −No stated data retention policy, which is a major red flag for IT and data governance.
- −Vendor maturity is completely unknown, with no details on founding year, team size, or funding.
- −Zero disclosed channel coverage or customer evidence, making it impossible for the CMO to assess business outcomes.
$ sources --all
Every claim above links to its origin. Nothing here is inferred without a citation; missing fields are marked Unknown rather than guessed.
No sources cited yet. Admins can attach citations from the admin panel.