← back to matrix
// under_the_hood

Relevance AI

AI Workflow Builder

relevanceai.com
[ ] unclaimed

$ stack_track_scores

methodology →
Transparency
7
0–100. Disclosure breadth + source quality.
Agentic Autonomy
55
0–100. Autonomy × breadth × outcome pricing.
Buyer Risk
UNRATED
1/5 inputs disclosed
Change Velocity (90d)
24
Detected changes in the last 90 days.
scored today

$ buyer_risk_breakdown

UNRATED

Unrated — insufficient public disclosure.

Not enough public disclosure to rate yet — 4 of 5 procurement inputs are still unknown. This is a data gap, not a negative signal.

  • Compliance certifications

    No SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR posture disclosed in our sources.

    to improve → Vendor publishes a trust/security page listing at least one certification.

  • Funding stage

    Funding stage not yet captured (may be a division of a larger public company).

    to improve → Mark parent company or public/profitable status.

  • Company age

    Founding year not yet captured.

    to improve → Add founding year to vendor profile.

  • Team size

    Team size band not yet captured.

    to improve → Add team size band (LinkedIn / vendor disclosure).

  • Data governance posture

    External processing: customer data is sent to vendor infrastructure.

    to improve → Offer a zero-copy or in-VPC deployment option.

Note — well-known brands often appear unrated because procurement-relevant fields (compliance certs, funding stage, team size band) haven't been captured yet. If you're on the Relevance AI team, claim this profile to fill in the gaps.

$ technical_anatomy

Wrapper Status
Pure Wrapper

Thin layer over a third-party foundation model. No proprietary weights.

Agent Autonomy
Fully Agentic

Plans and executes multi-step workflows end-to-end.

Data Governance
External Processing

Data is sent to vendor infrastructure for processing.

Deployment
Unknown

Where the inference pipeline runs.

Data Retention
Unknown

How long ingested data persists in vendor systems.

Last Detected Update
today

When we last detected a meaningful infrastructure change.

$ marketing_fit

Use cases
Unknown
Channels
Unknown
Output types
Unknown
Integrations
Unknown

$ commercial

Pricing model
Unknown

How customers are charged.

Pricing transparency
Unknown

Is pricing visible without sales contact?

Time to value
Unknown

How quickly customers see results.

Compliance
Unknown
Notable customers
Unknown
Customer logo count
Unknown

Public customer logos counted on vendor site.

$ company

Founded
Unknown

Year of incorporation.

Team size
Unknown

Headcount band.

Funding stage
Unknown

Latest disclosed round.

Headquarters
Unknown

Primary office location.

$ changelog --tail

  1. release_notestoday
    4cab7b156d0c6c2bbe602ccb
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  2. release_notes4 days ago
    886fea28ea804cab7b156d0c
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  3. vendor_site4 days ago
    776de84d999d4aeafb44bcde
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  4. vendor_site5 days ago
    dd28054bc1a4776de84d999d
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  5. release_notes8 days ago
    4cab7b156d0c886fea28ea80
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  6. release_notes8 days ago
    4e7fead9ff2f4cab7b156d0c
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  7. vendor_site9 days ago
    e2855e9a8e15dd28054bc1a4
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  8. vendor_site16 days ago
    54f431269836e2855e9a8e15
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  9. pricing17 days ago
    c2caa2aea53f356c4ea8807c
    src: Pricing Pageview source ↗
  10. release_notes22 days ago
    0ba0efa8e3ac4e7fead9ff2f
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  11. release_notes24 days ago
    4e7fead9ff2f0ba0efa8e3ac
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  12. release_notes1 mo ago
    0ba0efa8e3ac4e7fead9ff2f
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  13. vendor_site1 mo ago
    468535b6d50554f431269836
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  14. vendor_site1 mo ago
    54f431269836468535b6d505
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  15. vendor_site1 mo ago
    4c5a443086e154f431269836
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  16. release_notes1 mo ago
    3c7f4f9c08670ba0efa8e3ac
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  17. release_notes1 mo ago
    08e5016261ab3c7f4f9c0867
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  18. vendor_site1 mo ago
    8cb4f7e0e7dc4c5a443086e1
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  19. vendor_site1 mo ago
    468535b6d5058cb4f7e0e7dc
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  20. vendor_site1 mo ago
    8cb4f7e0e7dc468535b6d505
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  21. vendor_site1 mo ago
    35976ad884178cb4f7e0e7dc
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  22. release_notes1 mo ago
    8506ad9e132808e5016261ab
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  23. vendor_site1 mo ago
    bbd21746dde135976ad88417
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  24. release_notes1 mo ago
    08e5016261ab8506ad9e1328
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  25. vendor_site1 mo ago
    54f431269836bbd21746dde1
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  26. vendor_site1 mo ago
    bbd21746dde154f431269836
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  27. vendor_site1 mo ago
    cebdb1e1562bbbd21746dde1
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  28. release_notes1 mo ago
    7698b89fd1bb08e5016261ab
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  29. release_notes1 mo ago
    79b50c20a18e7698b89fd1bb
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  30. vendor_site1 mo ago
    ddb13adec75acebdb1e1562b
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  31. vendor_site1 mo ago
    817806407d65ddb13adec75a
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  32. release_notes1 mo ago
    0fef99765a8779b50c20a18e
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  33. vendor_site1 mo ago
    f36030ac4698817806407d65
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  34. vendor_site1 mo ago
    993b2e08b8ecf36030ac4698
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  35. release_notes1 mo ago
    79b50c20a18e0fef99765a87
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  36. vendor_site1 mo ago
    7d0bbc46b94d993b2e08b8ec
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  37. vendor_site2 mo ago
    dbb5deff65387d0bbc46b94d
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  38. vendor_site2 mo ago
    8dbea9070597dbb5deff6538
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  39. vendor_site2 mo ago
    7d0bbc46b94d8dbea9070597
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  40. release_notes2 mo ago
    3870750bce4a79b50c20a18e
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  41. vendor_site2 mo ago
    cfc17a9997917d0bbc46b94d
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  42. release_notes2 mo ago
    16db59d2124e3870750bce4a
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  43. vendor_site2 mo ago
    26e44aa9e0fccfc17a999791
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  44. vendor_site2 mo ago
    7d0bbc46b94d26e44aa9e0fc
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  45. release_notes2 mo ago
    c4457a47b9ac16db59d2124e
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  46. release_notes2 mo ago
    16db59d2124ec4457a47b9ac
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  47. vendor_site2 mo ago
    a728f2da479c7d0bbc46b94d
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  48. vendor_site2 mo ago
    6260f5809f58a728f2da479c
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  49. vendor_site2 mo ago
    636ae6a535976260f5809f58
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  50. security2 mo ago
    dc98bc52609e746801eaa1ed
    src: Security Pageview source ↗
  51. security2 mo ago
    dc98bc52609e746801eaa1ed
    src: Security Pageview source ↗
  52. vendor_site2 mo ago
    7d0bbc46b94d636ae6a53597
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  53. security2 mo ago
    746801eaa1eddc98bc52609e
    src: Security Pageview source ↗
  54. release_notes2 mo ago
    c4457a47b9ac16db59d2124e
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  55. release_notes2 mo ago
    16db59d2124ec4457a47b9ac
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  56. vendor_site2 mo ago
    4e13148045397d0bbc46b94d
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗
  57. release_notes2 mo ago
    c5cf93d70a3716db59d2124e
    src: Release Notesview source ↗
  58. vendor_site2 mo ago
    7d0bbc46b94d4e1314804539
    src: Vendor Siteview source ↗

$ how_ai_describes_us

all drift →

Weekly capture of how Gemini and Perplexity answer questions about Relevance AI. Hallucinations are checked against the verified facts above.

  • perplexity/sonar11 days ago[ ] not mentioned

    prompt: Recommend the top AI tools for AI Workflow Builder. List 5 with one-sentence descriptions.

    Here are **5 strong AI workflow builder tools** to consider, based on recent roundups and comparisons of 2026 workflow platforms.[1][2][4][7][16] - **n8n** — Best for technical teams that want **full control**, with open-source/self-hosted deployment and support for custom code.[2][4][16] - **Zapier** — Best for **fast no-code automations** across thousands of SaaS apps, especially for non-technical users.[2][4][16] - **Make** — Best for **visual, multi-step workflows** with detailed branching logic and strong data transformation capabilities.[2][4][16] - **Gumloop** — Best for **simple no-code AI workflows**, with templates and a visual builder aimed at medium-sized teams.[1][4][17] - **Vellum AI** — Best for teams building **production-grade AI workflows**, with collaboration features and support for technical and non-technical users.[7][10][16]

  • perplexity/sonar11 days ago[✓] mentioned1 hallucination

    prompt: What does Relevance AI do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.

    Relevance AI is a **low-code/no-code AI workflow and agent builder** for creating AI agents and multi-agent teams that can automate business tasks, such as customer support, sales operations, research, reporting, and internal workflows.[3][8][13] Its core product is a visual builder for agents, tools, workflows, and “AI workforce” orchestration, with built-in integrations and no-code tool creation.[1][3] It competes most directly with other **AI agent builders / workflow automation platforms**, especially tools used to build autonomous agents and business automations. Public review and comparison sources position it alongside products such as **MindStudio**, **11x-style AI workforce tools**, and broader automation stacks that can connect LLMs to business systems, while its feature set overlaps with workflow platforms like **Zapier**-style trigger/action automation.[16][17] Based on its positioning, it also competes indirectly with enterprise agent platforms and no-code AI app builders that target similar use cases.[8][14] Its **pricing model** is a **tiered SaaS subscription**, with a free tier and paid plans that scale by usage/credits and team/enterprise needs. Third-party reviews report a **free plan** and paid pricing starting around **$19/month** in one review, while other comparison pages report paid plans starting at **$199/month**; this suggests pricing may vary by plan structure, billing period, or have changed over time.[4][10][16] Relevance AI also sells an **enterprise** offering for larger deployments.[17] Notable customers are **not clearly listed in the search results provided**, so I can’t verify specific customer names from these sources. The most factual statement from the available material is that Relevance AI is marketed for sales, marketing, operations, support, and analytics teams, and is distributed through channels like Microsoft Marketplace and AWS Marketplace, which indicates enterprise and mid-market adoption but does not name customers.[8][13][17]

    • [pricing_model] claimed: Its pricing model is a tiered SaaS subscription, with a free tier and paid plans that scale by usage/credits and team/enterprise needs. Third-party reviews report a free plan and paid pricing starting around $19/month in one review, while other comparison pages report paid plans starting at $199/month; this suggests pricing may vary by plan structure, billing period, or have changed over time. Relevance AI also sells an enterprise offering for larger deployments. → actual: null
  • lovable_ai/google/gemini-3-flash-preview11 days ago[✓] mentioned1 hallucination

    prompt: What does Relevance AI do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.

    **Relevance AI** is a low-code platform designed to build, deploy, and manage **AI Agents** and multi-step workflows that automate repetitive business tasks. ### Core Functionality * **AI Agents:** Users can create autonomous agents specialized in tasks like research, lead generation, or customer support using LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, etc.). * **Workflow Builder:** A drag-and-drop interface to chain together tools, data sources, and AI prompts to process information at scale. * **Data Integration:** It allows users to connect their own datasets (PDFs, CSVs, APIs) to "ground" the AI and prevent hallucinations. * **Tools & Actions:** Agents can perform actions like sending emails, updating CRMs, or searching the web via integrations. ### Key Competitors * **Zapier Central / Zapier Interfaces:** Focused on simple automation triggers and basic AI actions. * **MindStudio (YouAI):** A direct competitor for building custom AI apps and internal tools. * **LangChain / Flowise:** Open-source frameworks that offer more granular control for developers. * **Lately / Lindy.ai:** Platforms focused on specific autonomous agent niches. ### Pricing Model Relevance AI operates on a **subscription + credit-based** model: * **Free:** A limited tier for testing with a small amount of monthly credits. * **Team:** Paid monthly subscription (approx. $199/month starting) providing higher execution limits and team collaboration features. * **Business/Enterprise:** Custom pricing for high-volume execution, advanced security, and dedicated support. * *Note: Tasks consume "credits" based on the complexity and the LLM model used.* ### Notable Customers The platform is used by over 20,000 organizations, including: * **Tech & Services:** HubSpot, Microsoft, and various high-growth startups. * **Consultancies:** Large professional service firms use it for automated document analysis and market research.

    • [wrapper_status] claimed: fully_agentic → actual: pure_wrapper
  • perplexity/sonar25 days ago[ ] not mentioned

    prompt: Recommend the top AI tools for AI Workflow Builder. List 5 with one-sentence descriptions.

    Here are **5 top AI workflow builder tools** to consider: **n8n**, **Zapier**, **Make**, **Gumloop**, and **Vellum**.[1][2][5][14][20] - **n8n** — Best for technical teams that want **self-hosting**, custom logic, and flexibility across AI and app integrations.[2][5][14] - **Zapier** — Best for non-technical users who want **fast, no-code automations** with a very large app connector ecosystem.[2][5][14] - **Make** — Best for building **visual, multi-step workflows** with detailed branching and data transformation control.[2][4][13][20] - **Gumloop** — Best for teams wanting **simple no-code AI workflows** with templates and AI-focused automation features.[1][2] - **Vellum** — Best for teams building **low-code AI workflows** and business automations with an emphasis on AI assistant-style workflow building.[14][20]

  • perplexity/sonar25 days ago[✓] mentioned

    prompt: What does Relevance AI do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.

    Relevance AI is a **low-code/no-code platform for building and managing AI agents and multi-agent workflows** that can automate business tasks like sales, customer support, research, enrichment, and internal operations.[3][7][14] The product is positioned as an “**AI workforce**” builder: users create specialized agents, connect them to tools and data, and chain them into workflows on a visual canvas with guardrails and deployment controls.[2][3][14] What it does in practice: - **Builds AI agents** from a prompt, template, or from scratch.[3] - **Connects agents to tools and APIs** such as email, CRM updates, web search, and custom APIs.[3][14] - **Coordinates multi-agent workflows** so multiple agents can pass work between each other on a visual canvas.[3][7] - **Automates business processes** across sales, marketing, operations, and support.[4][7][15] **Competitors** are other AI agent/workflow builders and automation platforms. Based on the category and comparable products mentioned in the results, relevant competitors include **MindStudio**, **Microsoft Copilot Studio**, **AWS-native agent tooling/marketplace offerings**, and broader workflow automation/AI-agent platforms such as **Eesel AI** and similar no-code agent builders.[7][14][17][12] If you want a tighter competitive set, the closest direct peers are other **AI workforce / multi-agent builder** tools rather than generic chatbots.[7][15] On **pricing**, the results show two different signals: one review source lists a **free version** and a **starting price of $19/month**,[4] while another source says paid plans start at **$199/month** with usage credits.[17] Because these are secondary sources and the pricing page itself was not included in the results, the safest factual statement is that Relevance AI appears to offer a **free tier** and **paid plans**, but the exact entry price is **conflicting across sources**.[4][17] Notable customers are **not clearly listed in the provided results**. The available sources mention use cases and integrations, but they do **not** name verified customer logos or case studies in the search results you provided.[3][4][14]

  • lovable_ai/google/gemini-3-flash-preview25 days ago[✓] mentioned1 hallucination

    prompt: What does Relevance AI do? It is an AI tool in the AI Workflow Builder category. Include who it competes with, pricing model, and any notable customers. Be specific and factual.

    **Relevance AI** is an enterprise-grade platform designed to build, deploy, and manage **AI Agents** and automated workflows. It allows businesses to integrate LLMs (like GPT-4 or Claude) into their existing operations to perform complex tasks autonomously. ### Core Functionality * **AI Agents:** Users can create "digital employees" for specific roles (e.g., SDRs, researchers, or customer support) that can reason, use tools, and interact with third-party APIs. * **Low-Code Workflow Builder:** A visual canvas to chain together LLM prompts, data transformations, and API calls. * **Tool Integration:** Connects with over 100+ platforms including Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, and Gmail. * **Knowledge Base:** Built-in vector database capabilities to allow agents to retrieve and act on internal company data (RAG). ### Key Competitors * **Zapier Central:** AI-driven automation within the Zapier ecosystem. * **Make.com:** Traditional workflow automation that has recently integrated AI capabilities. * **MindStudio (YouAI):** A platform for building personalized AI applications and workers. * **Retool:** Specifically their "Retool AI" features for building internal business tools. * **CrewAI / LangChain:** Open-source frameworks that cater to developers building similar agentic workflows. ### Pricing Model Relevance AI uses a **tiered subscription model** based on usage (credits): * **Free:** Limited credits to test features and build basic agents. * **Team:** Approximately **$199/month**, offering higher execution limits and team collaboration features. * **Business:** Approximately **$599/month**, designed for scaling agents across a department. * **Enterprise:** Custom pricing for unlimited scale, SSO, and dedicated support. ### Notable Customers Relevance AI is utilized by high-growth startups and established firms, including: * **TechStars** * **Microsoft** (specifically within certain internal innovation teams) * **Year13** * **Dovetail**

    • [wrapper_status] claimed: It allows businesses to integrate LLMs (like GPT-4 or Claude) into their existing operations to perform complex tasks autonomously. → actual: pure_wrapper

$ pricing_receipts

all receipts →

Weekly snapshot diff of Relevance AI's pricing page. Tiers extracted with AI, compared against the prior week.

current tiers · captured 3 mo ago

Enterprise
Custom

$ buyer_panel_verdict

full panel →

Synthetic buyer panel (CMO + RevOps + IT + Procurement) ranks Relevance AI against the AI Workflow Builder category. Grounded in disclosed facts only.

#116/100

Relevance AI marginally leads due to its stated 'fully_agentic' capability, but its near-total failure to disclose information on integrations, security, and pricing makes it an extremely high-risk and unverifiable option.

strengths
  • +Offers a 'fully_agentic' capability, which is its sole differentiating feature and a priority for the Head of Growth.
weaknesses
  • Complete lack of disclosure on integrations, channels, and compliance, making it impossible to assess fit for RevOps or IT.
  • No information provided on pricing model or vendor maturity, creating significant risk for Procurement.
  • Data governance is poorly defined with 'external_processing' and no disclosed data retention policy.
  • Extremely low transparency score based on the high number of null fields.

$ sources --all

Every claim above links to its origin. Nothing here is inferred without a citation; missing fields are marked Unknown rather than guessed.

No sources cited yet. Admins can attach citations from the admin panel.